top of page
google_preferred_source_badge_dark_en.png

£1,500 a Month, and the Till Still Balanced

Writer: David Holden
David Holden
4 days ago
4 min read

Updated: 2 days ago

Looking at an empty pub from behind the bar with a till screen on.



The Till Balanced Every Night. That Was The Problem

For a month, the manager closing up reopened checks that customers had already paid in cash. He added discounts after the event and moved payments around. The till then expected less cash than was sitting in the drawer. The cash balanced, and the difference went in his pocket.

Around £1,500 in one month. Left running, that site was on course to lose £18,000 a year.

Nobody saw him do it. The person doing the close was the person stealing, and the close is the check most sites rely on.

This is Part Four of the Staff Theft in Hospitality series. Part One · Part Two · Part Three


A Balanced Till Proves Nothing About Who Balanced It

Most operators treat a balanced till as good news. The cash matches the system, nobody is short, move on. But a balanced till only tells you the cash agrees with the records. If the person closing can change the records, they can make them agree with whatever is in the drawer.


That is exactly what happened here. There was no shortage to chase. There was no complaint, because every customer paid what they were charged.


How It Was Caught

It surfaced in the till's own records, through periodic checks of three things:

  1. Transactions made late, after service had finished

  2. Voids

  3. Voids and changes by payment type


Any one of those can have an innocent explanation. Clustered at close, on one person's login, they told the whole story.


He was dismissed. He paid the money back, in return for the matter not being passed to the police.


The evidence was in the system the whole time. Somebody just had to look at it, and that somebody could not be the person who created it.


Why Managers Get Missed

A manager holds the codes. They authorise voids and discounts, close the till and often do the banking. On a small site, one person can make a change, approve it and check it.


Every guide on staff theft says the same thing: take the void button off the bar staff and give it to the manager. Here, the manager was the one emptying the till. Moving the power up the chain doesn't remove the risk. It hands it to the one person nobody checks.


Scale makes no difference to the gap. At a Hilton in San Francisco, a manager who could sign off contractor work and approve the payments took around $1.9 million in kickbacks between 2013 and 2016. He was sentenced to 65 months in prison in 2024. Same weakness: the person approving was the person checking.


Research points the same way. A study of hospitality workers in New Zealand found theft was common, and most common in workplaces where under-staffing and poor training were common too. (Poulston, 2008)


How To Stop It

On a small site you can't split every job. The same person often pours the pint, takes the cash and locks the door. So the aim changes. You may not stop one person handling the cash, but you can make it impossible for them to hide what they did.

  1. Split What You Can 

    Whoever reopens, voids or discounts a closed check should not be the person who counts and banks the cash. Managers don't reconcile the shifts they ran.

  2. Cash Up Blind

    Whoever counts the drawer doesn't see what the till expects until the count is written down and sealed. You can't make the cash fit a figure you haven't seen.

  3. Review The Exceptions by User, Every Week

    Reopened checks, late transactions, voids, discounts, payment-type changes and no-sale openings. Investigate voids above 1.0% of sales, discounts above 3.0% and comps above 0.5%. This is the check that caught him.

  4. Check The Checker

    The owner, or someone from outside the business, matches the weekly variances against what actually reached the bank.

  5. Make Cash Roles Take Time Off

    Consecutive days, with someone else running the close. Some things only show up when the person hiding them isn't there.

  6. Put a Camera on the Till and the Cash Up

    If a variance appears, the footage for that time is there to pull.

  7. Give Staff a Route Above the Manager

    If the problem is the manager, the team needs someone else to tell.


Individual logins, per-person void reports and isolating tills are covered in Part Three.


A manager you trust with the keys still needs checking. If they are honest, the checks cost you nothing. If they are not, nothing else will catch it.


This Week

Pull last month's voids, discounts and payment changes on closed checks, by user and by time of day. If one name dominates after close, ask why.


See also:

I'm David Holden. I've spent 30 years working across hospitality audit and operations, helping hotels, pubs, restaurants and bars identify where profit is being lost and put practical controls in place to stop it.



Something not adding up?

Tell me what you’re seeing. I’ll come back to you with an honest view,

and if there’s nothing there, I’ll say so.

bottom of page